DB
Oct 12, 2017
Great into to Java, instructors have clearly put thought in to the format with the choose your own learning style videos, and additional coverage where it may be needed. These have been very helpful.
AP
Jul 1, 2020
The challenges were interesting and thought provoking. The concept challenges are very helpful. Hearing different line of thoughts to a question helps to understand how much we grasped a concept
By Kaustubh M
•Oct 28, 2021
good
By Biradar v m
•Jun 22, 2020
good
By Ritesh U
•May 5, 2020
nice
By Nguyễn T D H ( F H
•Apr 22, 2024
N/A
By RIYA D
•Aug 12, 2021
NAA
By Priya V
•Apr 11, 2019
gud
By Christopher W
•Apr 11, 2020
Overall it was a neat course and I do feel I learned a lot. A lot of thought went into the design of the course and I like a lot of the different types of videos, e.g. "concept challenge," "when I struggled." The earthquake project was really neat and a fun way to introduce concepts like inheritance and polymorphism, among others.
It does feel like the content is a bit dated, though. I had to install a much earlier version of Java to even get it to run. I'm not sure how useful learning about some of the specific libraries will be in the future, but it was useful to get used to the concept of going to documentation to see how to interact with an API, so not a total loss on that front.
It seemed a bit heavy on lecture and not so much interactivity along the way until the programming assignment.
I love the concept of the peer reviewed assignment, but with not many people going through together, your stuff sits out there for days waiting to be graded.
The forums are a ghost town.
By Hans E G
•Oct 25, 2017
There should be more assignments, so learners like me can get the information in a more thorough way. The jingle at the beginning of the core videos are much louder than the rest of the video and gets annoying pretty quick. The audio and video quality is poor and sometimes differentiates from video to video. The concepts introduced in this course are great, but I just wished there were some assignments to build the modules, so inexperienced learners like me could grasp the new concepts easier and write more code. I did do the Duke courses beforehand so I had high expectations from this course.
By Brandon W
•Nov 10, 2020
There were many new concepts I've learned from this course. However, I spent most of the time on finding a way figuring out how to run modules with deprecated options in a poor environment (OPENGL for instance). A huge part of this course relies on an old library that didn't update since 2016. And it's not compatible with current MacOS. As you may know, 4 years in any sort of tech means a tremendous gap in between, I see it here as well. There's no perfect course, I admit. It was another interesting experience.
By Richard v W
•Aug 26, 2021
The course is several years old now and in need of updating e.g. it uses Java 8 and Java applets which have been deprecated from the more recent versions of Java. The required version of Java doesn't work with the most up-o-date version of the Eclipse IDE - I had to spend quite a few hours figuring out which was the right combination of Java and Eclipse. In itself that is potentially useful experience but it was not something I had budgeted for.
By Eric H
•Nov 17, 2020
I learned a lot, but it was difficult.
Having taken other computing courses at Coursera there were a number of things that I really missed having. One of my other courses was tied to a textbook that the instructor had written. This was really helpful. Two of the other courses in this specialization also had online help resources with summaries of syntax for what we had covered thus far. Those were also of a great benefit.
By Juan V A
•May 17, 2020
The course is an introduction to programming, and also to event-driven programming.
The good thing about it is that, despite most introductory courses will start with CLI applications, this course jumps you into developing a GUI application with map-based information, which is really cool.
However, I found that explanations lack some background, some topics are explained quite fast while others are barely explained.
By Lennart K
•Apr 8, 2025
The theory teaching parts are great and easy to understand. Just the practical assignments in the end of each module seem very outdated (by almost 10 years). This lead to me having to spend a lot of time to get this old tech to work which was a bit frustrating at times. Also it can take quite a while to get someone to review your mandatory peer review of the final project.
By Orlando C
•Mar 7, 2018
It was way too hard for me and I even did the previous 2 courses in the specialization. I saw many new functions and understanding the logic of them slowed me down. A particular topic for me that should be a separate item in the course is dealing with interactivity. A mini project, simple, just for learning how mouse clicks and hovers work would be fine.
By Ankur A
•Jan 31, 2021
The UnfoldingMap and Processing libraries used in this course are clunky and not very fun to use.
BTW, this course *does not* teach you any serious Object Oriented Programming design or concepts in Java. This course barely skims over OO concepts and lacks depth. This is a beginner's course and won't teach you any serious OO skills for the industry.
By Cristian R S
•Feb 28, 2017
I expected much more in this course. In my point of view, a very long time was spent to learn how to draw something in the screen. I thought this course would be focused in Object Oriented Programming and all about the best practices, why not? But it didn't, sometimes was very hard to go on with this. Anyway, thank you all.
By Valeriano T
•Jan 21, 2016
The course is very good explained. However the practice relies a lot in code that cannot be explained like applets or mapping components... Sometimes you need more time to go through the documentation of a graphic library that you will never use again than in doing the actual assignment's core thing.
By Aravind V
•Jun 4, 2019
The course was good. But I felt the introduction of the map APIs along with the event handling kind of took away the learning towards the API rather than the actual topic. I felt somehow it was a diversion with its own learning curve. Other wise the course is good overall.
By SHIVAM P
•Oct 1, 2018
I have yet not completed the course and was stuck in mid-way at one question. I need to complete and get the certificate as I need to submit as MOOCS in my college. Please let me complete the course. I am already done with 98%. Please don't charge for that course.
By Marius-Cristian B
•Jul 17, 2018
I had really big issues with the GUI since I couldn't figure out how to set ECLIPSE / Video card driver to display correctly my GUI...
Overall, the teachers were great and the courses awesome!
there is a lot of new info and I had fun coding!
Thank you!
By Alex S
•Mar 21, 2021
Difficult to follow. Not as good as the Duke University courses where the professors explain in great depth, and detail. The good about the course is that they do give you the recourses to learn Object Oriented Programming in Java
By bws
•Mar 28, 2020
Although this course was well-designed, the content has been out-of-date. Most of companies need programmers to design web-page not GUI. And the Applet has been dead, don't waste your time on it plz.
By Nouran M
•Sep 23, 2020
This course is good for establishing basic knowledge especially if all these OOP concepts are new to you, yet the exercises didn't train us much on these concepts . i recommend it for a good start.
By ARITRA M
•Aug 31, 2020
The course theory is good, instructor works very hard to do their best, But the problem is the resource is out-dated , can't run on latest ver. of java .
By Kirill E
•Jan 19, 2016
Peer reviews was unfair. It's must be any methods to exclude inadequate learners from reviewing. Blacklists is only one way to stop them now.